Every release risks a new accessibility regression — a label that disappears, a focus order that breaks, a control a screen reader can no longer reach. QA11Y Labs monitors your live site each month, diffs the accessibility tree against the prior baseline, and tells you exactly what changed.
Sites change constantly — new components, content edits, third-party widgets, framework updates. Each change can quietly break the experience for screen-reader and keyboard users. Monthly monitoring keeps the picture current and gives you documented, defensible proof of ongoing effort.
Automated scans flag a fraction of real issues. The rest hide in keyboard order, ARIA semantics, and what the screen reader actually announces — until a user reports them.
ADA Title II, Section 508, and WCAG 2.2 conformance aren't a checkbox — they require evidence that you're maintaining accessibility over time. Monthly reports build that record.
A regression flagged in the next monthly report costs minutes to fix. The same issue surfaced by a complaint or a legal notice costs orders of magnitude more.
We monitor what assistive technology actually sees — not just the visible page. Each month, your site is captured, compared against the prior baseline, and reviewed by a QA11Y Labs accessibility specialist before anything reaches your inbox.
Each monitored page is rendered and the live accessibility tree — roles, names, states, and relationships — is captured as the canonical baseline.
The current tree is compared to last month's baseline. We surface what disappeared, what changed role or name, and what is newly unreachable.
Key flows are exercised with JAWS, NVDA, and VoiceOver to confirm that what the tree says matches what a real user hears.
Findings are reviewed by an accessibility specialist before delivery. No noise, no false alarms — only changes that matter, with context.
You receive a clear, branded monthly report — what changed, what was fixed, what's open, and what's coming next. Built for both your team and your legal record.
Major release coming? Need a second look before a launch? Higher tiers include between-cycle access for the moments compliance can't wait a month.
Every tier includes accessibility-tree diffing, screen-reader regression checks, human review by QA11Y Labs, and a monthly report. Coverage and response time scale with the tier.
Steady ongoing coverage for smaller sites that need consistent compliance tracking and a documented record.
Deeper coverage for teams actively shipping updates and needing thorough regression tracking between releases.
Full-coverage monitoring with dedicated support for organizations with strict compliance and procurement requirements.
Every tier includes: accessibility-tree diffing against the prior baseline, screen-reader regression checks, human review by a QA11Y Labs accessibility specialist, and a monthly compliance report. Pricing is scoped to your site — request a quote and we'll size the plan to the work, not the other way around.
The monthly report is the artifact your team and your lawyers both want on file. It's written to be acted on by developers and understood by everyone else.
Want to see the shape of the report before you commit? Ask for a sample report.
If your site changes month over month, your accessibility posture changes with it. Monthly monitoring is for the organizations that can't afford to find out about regressions from a complaint.
"A clean audit on Monday doesn't mean a clean site on Friday. Monitoring is how you keep the work you paid for from quietly slipping away."Quintin Williams Founder, QA11Y Labs
If you haven't had a recent WCAG audit, we usually start there — a clean baseline makes every monthly diff afterward more useful. Already audited? Monitoring picks up the day after we hand off.
See WCAG audit optionsIf you don't see your question here, get in touch — we'll answer in plain language, without sales pressure.
Automated scanners flag a known subset of issues — roughly 30% of real accessibility barriers. We use scanners as one input, but the meaningful work is diffing the live accessibility tree, running screen-reader checks, and having an accessibility specialist review the result. The report is curated, not auto-generated.
We agree on a set of monitored URLs and key user flows during onboarding — typically your highest-traffic pages, login and checkout, and any flows tied to compliance or revenue. The scope grows or shrinks with your tier.
No. Monitoring runs against your public site. If you'd like us to verify a fix on staging or pre-production before release, higher tiers include between-cycle access for that.
Yes — the report is dated, scoped, mapped to WCAG 2.2 success criteria, and reviewed by a named accessibility specialist. Many of our clients keep the report stack as part of their ADA Title II or Section 508 evidence record.
If our checks surface a high-severity regression, we don't wait for the next report — we contact you directly. Growth and Enterprise tiers include explicit escalation paths and between-cycle access.
Yes. Monthly monitoring is month-to-month. We'd rather earn the next month than lock you into something you've outgrown.
